Media–Freedom of Speech?

Comments Off on Media–Freedom of Speech?

In early June, we had a seminar entitled “How Foreign Media reported the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear emergencies.” as a part of Global Agenda Series at Roppongi Academy Hills.  The speaker was Mr. Erick Johnston of the Japan Times and I moderated the Q & A session.

We had some 200 participants, aged from 20s to 70s, with a variety of background. The number of participants exceeded our expectations,  which I thought, indicated the high interest in the topic.

As I wanted to know the reasons why 200 people signed up for the seminar, I asked the question at the beginning.  It turned out that there was a three way split,  among those who want to find out the reasons why foreign media (it was reported often) made rather “extreme” and “sensational” reports of the disaster, those who want to know how the condition of Japan is reported now in the world and those who want to know how information should be communicated to the world. (We had few who were interested in the role of social media.)

With that information, Mr. Johnston began his presentation in Japanese.  Though we had a bit of technical difficulties (it usually happens at the worst time!), he managed to finish the presentation, which was very informative.

I then made a brief summary of his talk together with my impressions and reactions, as I thought his presentation had a lot of materials.  I then opened the session to the floor.

Q & A session was quite lively as there were some media people, ex-government people, ex nuclear engineer (I believe) and others. The issue is quite complicated . Some examples of  what we discussed include 1) how much and in what way should  information be disclosed and reported, 2) what type of information people in different societies demand ,3) how they take the information, and 4) what  we do when nobody knows what is actually happening, among others.

My take away from the seminar was as follows:

1) Prioritization is a “must” when resources (money and time) are limited. As many nations, organizations, people and events are fighting for the attention at the global level, fewer journalists were assigned to cover Japan than before, as the presence of the country has declined. We must be aware of this fact.

2) Timing is critical for communication as the media (and the world, for that matter) may pay attention to the news for a while, but will move on to cover something else soon. Many things are going on in the world.

3) Unless we become aware of the diversity of views, we may not develop sensitivity to information, so that we make effort to expose ourselves to different information sources

4) Freedom of speech is something that each individual acquires, (and not just simply given) and each one of us must exercise it ourselves.

In particular, 4) made a strong impression on me.  It is because I have realized recently  that we are losing the need to “get” (cannot think of better words for now) freedom, economic independence, knowledge, wisdom and the type of life we want, rather than wait some organization or institution to grant us . I have felt the keen need to restore  the sense of “Go, Get it”.

A lot of lessons here. For example, how could I have saved the awkward time of technical difficulties (it does happen!) ?  This is something I could work on for the next time.  Many issues related to freedom and our right have stimulated my thinking and will continue to do so.

Read More Share

Recent Author Posts

Join Our Community

Connect On Social Media

Most Popular Posts

We Blog The World

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!