Luxury and Stylish Watches Worth Investigating…

Comments Off on Luxury and Stylish Watches Worth Investigating…

With 60% of 18-34 year-olds using their phone as their primary timepiece, it’s a great time to buy a new watch. Sure, “wrist glances” are not as necessary as they once were, but that may explain why today’s fashion is big watches, really big, bling watches.

While I have been lusting after the Tiffany Atlas for a long time now, it’s probably a safe bet that a $7,900 watch is probably not the right message to send in today’s turbulent market, where the pauperization of certain regions demands visible restraint.

Tiffany Atlas chronograph watchThe Tiffany Atlas men’s stainless steel has beautiful Art Deco over tones, reminiscent of “Atlas Shrugged.” This stainless steel model features black rubber and gray dial. It has a 42 mm case, chronograph function, mechanical movement with automatic winding, date window, and is water resistant to 100 meters/328 feet (10 bars). Naturally, it’s Swiss-made.

This despite the fact that the latest edition of Esquire magazine showcases ads and articles spotlighting very expensive watches, like the Breitling Transocean Chronograph Unitime ($11,200), IWC Schaffhausen Portuguese Automatic Edition “Tribeca Film Festival 2013” ($13,600) and the Raymond Weil Freelancer ($2,950).

So what is it about these big watches? In the industry the trend is called “wrist presence” — a tongue-in-cheek reference to “web presence.” In the 90s, a watch case with a diameter of 38 mm was more than enough, with most watches sized between 33 mm and 35 mm. But now size matters, with the latest models reaching 42 mm and some even boasting a 45-mm diameter.

The big watch trend accelerated over the past decade, with watchmakers like Breitling, Franck Muller, IWC, Lange & Söhne, Omega and Panerai, plus even traditionally conservative companies like Cartier offering models with ample quantities of what the industry likes to refer to as “wrist presence.”

The record holder is probably the U-Boat U-1942, a limited edition of just 29 timepieces, that measures a whopping 64 mm, or 2.5 inches. The company has throttled that size back to “only” 53 mm (ref. 6157).

U-Boat U-42 special edition watchBehold, a 64-mm behemoth. The Uboat U-1942, of which, thankfully, only 29 pieces were made, has a 2.50-inch diameter, that screams “wrist presence here.”

In 1957, Piaget introduced the slimmest mechanism the world had ever seen, codenamed 9P, which was just two millimeters thick. That made way for the 12P, boasting a 2.3-mm automatic mechanism.

The world's thinnest watchEver since 1988, the Piaget Altiplano has held on to the thinnest watch record. But the Altiplano’s case size has grown in both girth and thickness, now measuring 43 mm and 5.25 mm, respectively.

But back to my decision process. You have to keep in mind that what makes a watch beautiful to one observer is a highly subjective opinion.

After deciding that the Atlas was out, my continuously shopping eyes fixated on the TAG Heuer Formula 1 WAU1113.BA0858. I always thought the Japanese and Koreans were bad at product naming, now I know better. The TAG Heuer sells $1,100+ and as you can see from the picture below, it has a very nice white face:

TAG Heuer Formula 1 automatic chronograph stainless steel watchI like this TAG Heuer because it has a relatively reasonable price, but also because of its white face and simplicity, for a TAG Heuer that is.

I also considered the UK’s Christopher Ward, whose C3 Malvern MK2 Chronograph ($365) captured my imagination for a spell, until I discovered that it was a manual wind watch, which slightly tempered my enthusiasm. But’s it’s a beautiful watch nonetheless:

Christopher Ward bargain chronographUK-based Christopher Ward offers the very beautiful C3 Malvern MK2 Chronograph for the very reasonable price of $365. Notice the C3’s elegant simplicity, beautiful stainless band, plus that gorgeous watch face texture.

Another beautiful model was the Christopher Ward C60 Trident Automatic ($635), which is a nice Rolex look-alike. But after staring at its photo for a long time, I decided that I didn’t like the design of the watch hands and position of the date window at 4p (16:00). See how subjective watch esthetics can be?

After trying to pour over Amazon.com’s watch store pages one by one and giving up after viewing about 200 watches out of its total inventory of 89,635, I decided to surf watch forums where I found a recommendation for a watch that had recently shown up on my radar, the Tissot PRC 200 T014.427.11.051.01:

Tissot PRC 200 automatic chronograph watchThe Tissot PRC 200 was a pleasant surprise. I was familiar with this brand from my days of living in Aruba, which featured many Tissot stores and advertising. This is was one of the chronographs to be mentioned in a watch forum question about top chronograph recommendations. It’s sub-$700 price is remarkable for such a fine Swiss automatic with a wrist-wrestling presence.

This highly recommended watch is also available at a very reasonable $650 at Amazon.com, which was a bonus. It’s also the lead image of this story, so you’ll get a really good look at what Mr. Ubercool likes.

Now I’ve focused primarily on stainless steel watchbands. A lot of people prefer watches with a leather strap but if you’re going to switch bands anyway, it’s helpful to know that it’s much easier to go from a stainless steel band to a leather band than vice versa.

 

Read More Share

Recent Author Posts

Join Our Community

Connect On Social Media

Most Popular Posts

We Blog The World

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!